Rupert Murdoch’s Sky News Portrays Ukraine’s ‘Far Right’ as ‘Heroes’

7 52

Eric Zuesse, 25 Jan. 2015

- Advertisement -

On January 22nd, Rupert Murdoch’s Sky
News (Murdoch founded it, his son James headed it for a while, and their 21st
Century Fox owns “a controlling stake” in it) telecast a
puff-piece for Ukraine’s right-wing extremists, several times calling them
“heroes” to “patriotic” Ukrainians. This segment of their documentary series
“Ross Kemp: Extreme World,” was titled “Ukraine: The Rise of The Right.” In it,
Ukraine’s “far right” are described as being patriots who are protecting all of
Ukraine from a Russian invasion, and who are therefore being increasingly
admired by Ukrainians. It says:
“The ultras [ultra-rightists] are actually patriotic young people who are ready
to fight — not only on the Maidan, but also at the war for our land. … These
men — seen now by many as heroes — are fighting for the Azov Battalion in
Mariupol, Maryinka and Iliovaisk.”

The message is that whereas these
far-rightists were previously despised, they now are widely respected:
“Just a few years ago they were on the fringes of society — shunned
for their violent behaviour and xenophobic beliefs, but since the 2014
Maidan revolution — and the subsequent fighting against pro-Russian groups —
their popularity has grown.”

In the segment here, the presenter, Ross Kemp,
says, at 15:25, that, Ukraine “faces the threat of a full-scale
Russian invasion. NATO has called the crisis in Ukraine, the biggest threat to
European security since World War Two. Amidst this chaos, volunteer far-right battalions
have put up some of the strongest resistance.”
He then notes that the city
of Mariupol in Ukraine’s southeast “is currently being defended by a
right-wing militia called the Azov Battalion.”


At 17:55, Kemp refers
to “occupied Crimea,” as if Crimea (which had been part of Russia from
1783 to 1954, and where far more of the residents still considered
themselves to be “Russian” than “Ukrainian”
) had been seized by
Russian troops, instead of Crimea having been protected against invasion of
troops from the new Ukrainian Government immediately after the
February 22nd coup in which Obama had seized control over Ukraine’s Government
,
by the use of paid mercenaries (‘volunteers’) from the nazi Right Sector, who
were headed by Dmitriy Yarosh, and by other racist mercenaries,
some from outside Ukraine.

Ross Kemp is then in Mariupol, where he
says: “Just to give you an idea of how vulnerable this city is, in the
distance is Russia, all the way along there
[and he points at the
supposedly feared Russia]. … In May of 2014, Mariupol was one of several
cities seized by pro-Russia separatists. … How did a predominantly far-right
militia
[Azov] end up defending one of Ukraine’s most important cities?
… The fight to defend Mariupol has made the
[Azov] Battalion specialists
in urban warfare. The majority are ordinary Ukrainians united by a sense of
patriotism
[he doesn’t say ‘nationalism,’ but ‘patriotism,’ so as to give
it an attractive odor].”

He also doesn’t deny that “some” of the
Azov fighters are White-supremacists (they make it too obvious). At 20:25,
he says: “But there’s an altogether darker ideology that unites some
Azov members.”
A swastika is shown; then an Azov fighter is interviewed
saying, ‘’’It’s a war with Russia.’” The idea Rupert Murdoch’s man Kemp
wants to convey here is that these fighters are “patriots,” who are “volunteering”
to “defend” Ukraine against “pro-Russians” and against “Russian
troops”
(he uses that phrase though there’s actually no sign of any of
those). He ignores that Obama’s team had taken over Ukraine during a coup which
was long in the planning and which used the public “Maidan”
anti-corruption demonstrations as merely a ‘democratic’ PR backdrop
.
In fact, here is the U.S. State Department’s
Victoria Nuland, telling the U.S. Ambassador to Ukraine Geoffrey Pyatt, on 4
February 2014, whom he is to place at the top of the post-coup Government; and,
when the coup occurred, this “Yats” was indeed the person who became appointed 22 days later. No hint of
such background is given in Rupert Murdoch’s ‘news’ (propaganda) report.

At 30:20, Ross Kemp
says: “Since February of 2014, Ukrainian forces and pro-Russian
separatists have been locked in a bloody battle for control of towns in the
east.
[Actually, the civil war had started not in February 2014, such as he
says, but on 9 May 2014. The Obama
coup
had occurred in February 2014, overthrowing the Ukrainian
President, Viktor Yanukovych, for whom more than 70% of the residents in southeastern Ukraine
had voted; and the civil war didn’t start till May because it wasn’t clear till
May that the newly installed Government wanted the residents in the southeast
to die or else to flee to Russia — to be gone from Ukraine. Obama didn’t want
them voting in any future Ukrainian national elections, because that would
jeopardize the lasting-power of his coup-Government.] This is the town hall
of Mariupol. Five months ago, Russian separatists stormed this building. …
The Russian supporters were made to leave, but when they did, they torched it.”

[He’s there trying to convey the idea that “Russian supporters” had torched the
town hall in Mariupol. But, actually, it wasn’t the “town hall”; it was the
police station; and there’s no indication that the locals had torched it.
Instead: On 9 May 2014, which is the very day that Ukraine’s civil war started
throughout southeastern Ukraine (in response to the May 2nd massacre in Odessa), the local
police force refused to take commands from the invading Ukrainian Government
troops of western Ukraine, who were then entering Mariupol to take the city
over. Anti-coup people entered the building in order to occupy it, and a battle
ensued between the Kiev troops and the Mariupol locals. The locals were driven
out by Ukraine’s military; and the police station was torched, but no one knows
by whom. Here is video of the police station on
fire, on 9 May 2014. Here is a detailed description and another
actual video of the burning; and the description that’s given, which comes from
a resident there, makes clear that the invading troops burned the building down
because the local police refused to accept the authority of the newly imposed
Government. But the “town hall” also had been involved in Ukraine’s
invasion. Here is a Reuters article on 7 May 2014,
reporting that “Ukrainian forces seized the rebel-held city hall in the
eastern port city of Mariupol overnight, driving out pro-Russian
activists, then withdrew, making no attempt to hold onto the
building, witnesses said. …. Witnesses said the soldiers left after smashing
furniture and office equipment.” Maybe they burned it later. The vandals
were the haters — the very people whom Ross Kemp so obviously admires. In any
case, what Kemp is saying about the event is almost certainly false. He
pretends to be a videographer, but his video presents no evidence — merely
assertions by Ukrainian Government officials and soldiers.]

Here and here and here are
how what Kemp fearsomely calls the “pro-Russian separatists” (or, as Reuters
had referred to them, ‘activists’) in Mariupol first encountered the
Obama-coup-regime’s troops, as those troops invaded Mariupol slaughtering
residents on 9 May 2014. And here is
what had happened at the largest southeastern city, Donetsk, just three days
earlier, on May 6th. That Donetsk video refers to the Ukrainian oligarch or
aristocrat Kolomoysky. He was the man who had financed the
massacre on May 2nd of entirely peaceful anti-coup demonstrators in Odessa —
the massacre that had actually caused the people in the other
rejectionist cities to become separatists
. It caused some
southeastern areas to go all the way to refusing to accept the Obama-installed
coup-government at Kiev, and to establish instead their own independent nation,
in order to protect themselves from the (it had by then become blatantly clear)
rabidly anti-Russian racist-fascists, or nazis, whom
Obama had placed into power in Kiev
. Obama needed the May 2nd massacre in order to terrorize the people in
the southeast so as to cause them to form their own government to protect
themselves from it, thus enabling the ‘legitimate’ Government (the one that
Obama had just installed in his actually illegal coup) to call them ‘Terrorists’ and so
to have an excuse to bomb and drive them out, so as to eliminate the residents
in the pro-Yanukovych area, so that no similar
Ukrainian President would ever again be able to be elected by voters in
Ukraine. This was essential in order to get Obama’s imposed illegal nazi Government to stick, to last.
Kolomoysky was an ally, and an employer of the family and friends, of
key people in the Obama Administration
, and all of them could
benefit enormously from killing and driving out lots of residents in the
heavily-pro-Yanukovych southeastern portion of Ukraine. 

At 31:30, Ross Kemp
says: “After months of attacks, Kalinovka [he pronounced it
‘Kalikovka’] is a ghost town. All of the houses have been abandoned here.”
He doesn’t even care to mention why the surviving residents had left: Ukraine’s
troops had been shelling, bombing, and shooting at them, so survivors fled into
the separatist-controlled area, or else into Russia. 

At 33.00, he’s at the
border heading into Donbass (the separatist-controlled region), and is told by
the nazi troops to go back from whence he came, because press presence might
draw fire from pro-Russian snipers just beyond that demarcation-line — which is
just a lie, but the sucker or propagandist apparently took everything that
these fascists told him as being the gospel truth, and he was basically a mere
video stenographer for these nazis anyway, not a real journalist (who questions
everything).

So: Ross Kemp went back to Mariupol. He
didn’t even care to get the opponents’ side of this war. The nazis told him to
go back to Mariupol, so he did. This is Rupert Murdoch’s ‘news’ operation:
one-sided ‘news’ only. (Any intelligent person who watched the ‘documentary’ up
to that point, had to recognize by now that this was really no ‘news report’ at
all, but pure war-propaganda. Even if that fact hadn’t become blatant before,
it now became blatant.)

At 39.00, Kemp says: “The
city
[Mariupol] formed its own militia because of the threat posed by
Russian separatists and, the Russian Federation.
” An interviewed Ukrainian
official, a woman, tells him that “Russian troops … systematically
destroyed”
the city. She calls herself a “nationalist.” No evidence
is presented — and none is asked for — to support her “Russian troops”
allegation. He just accepts everything she tells him.

At 41.30, he says: “You
can see why regiments like the Azov Battalion and other far-right battalions
are gaining support here. Because they’re volunteers who are making the
ultimate sacrifice to defend the city. And so people here are rallying to their
cause.”
Actually, most of the “people here” must both hate and fear
the nazis. The residents know that they’ll be killed if they express any
support whatsoever for the anti-coup, or anti-‘Maidan,’ side. To a ‘reporter’
like Kemp, it makes no difference what the reality of or for the residents
there is.

In other words: This documentary by
Rupert Murdoch’s Sky ‘News’ is just pro-nazi
propaganda, which conflates “nationalism” with patriotism, and which presents
nazis as being heroes, instead of as being the rabid anti-democratic bigots
that they actually are.

The Obama-installed coup-government was
assigned by Obama, and by the IMF, to exterminate as many of the
residents in the Donbass region of southeast Ukraine as possible, because 90% of these residents had voted for the very man, Viktor
Yanukovych
, whom Obama’s nazis overthrew
on 22 February 2014
. (The dark purple region on that map, in the far
east of Ukraine, is the area that had voted at least 90% for Yanukovych; and
it’s the area that broke away from Ukraine in May 2014 and is being bombed by
Obama’s Ukrainian forces. That area was traditionally called “Donbass,” but
many of its inhabitants now call themselves “Novorossiyans,” or new Russians,
because they want to be part of Russia, which their region used to be part of.)
So, this Government sent these nazis in, to finish the job, for Obama and for
their own oligarchs.

Do the viewers of Sky ‘News’ want to
know any of that background? Apparently not — after all, they are viewers of
Sky ‘News.’ They are fascists, and many of them are like Obama’s team: they are
nazis — racist fascists. (Most of those viewers probably just call themselves
“conservative.” Of course, they won’t acknowledge that Obama too is
“conservative.”)

That video was called “Part 2” of
Kemp’s propaganda-film about how heroic Ukraine’s nazis are. Here is
“Episode 1” (or “Part 1,” as alternatively tagged). Most of it is actually the
same video and text, except organized differently (placing the emphasis upon
the failure of the post-coup Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko to be
sufficiently nazi to satisfy these ‘patriots’).

Here is a bit of the relevant
historical background that Murdoch’s operation decided to hide from both
versions: “The Nazis Even Hitler Was Afraid Of.”

And here
is the current geopolitical context of Obama’s February 2014 take-over of Ukraine.

Ironically, the view that the rightist
oligarch Murdoch is spreading — that Putin is the aggressor in this war and
that Obama is not — is exactly the same view that the leftist oligarch George Soros is
spreading about it
. In fact (as can be seen from Soros’s many
statements and actions there), both of those Western oligarchs are remarkably similar,
and Soros could as well have hired the people who hired Ross Kemp as Murdoch
did. Kemp’s ‘documentary’ is 100% in line with Soros’s many essays about the situation in Ukraine.
The biggest difference between these two aristocrats is that they’re in
different lines of business — different rackets. (Here is a partial list of the companies that Murdoch
controls. Soros is instead an investor
and a ‘philanthropist.’
)


DISCUSSION

When ‘right’ and ‘left’ merge and
become one, at nazi (i.e., racist-fascist), such as does occur in the top aristocratic circle (especially
regarding Ukraine)
, then what authentic meaning remains to standard
political debate? What does the public then know of ‘democracy’? How is
democracy then even possible? It’s not. (And that linked-to scientific study,
specifically of the U.S., proves that the U.S. is not a democracy. But this
problem is far broader than merely the U.S.)

Perhaps wealth-inequality is getting to
be so extreme as to close out even the possibility of democracy. Let’s not fool
ourselves about how big the challenge is; it’s enormous:

On 9 October 2013, Credit Suisse issued
their Global Wealth Report 2013, authored by Anthony
Shorrocks, Jim Davies, and Rodrigo Lluberasis. It reported that the world’s
richest 0.7% owned 13.67 times as much as did the world’s poorest 68.7%. That
super-rich 0.7% (each with net-worths above $50,000,000) owned 41% of this
planet’s private assets. The world’s richest 8.4% owned 83.3%. The world’s
richest 31.3% owned 97%. So: the bottom 68.7% owned just 3%. (All of these
findings are calculated from the data shown on page 22.) Overall, the share of
global wealth was “barely 1% for the bottom half of all adults” worldwide (see
page 4). Furthermore, economic mobility into and out of the billionaire class,
during the latest ten-year period (2000-2010), was low: only 24% entered or
left the class during the decade (see page 28).

According to Vilfredo
Pareto
, who was the father of today’s ‘welfare’ economics and also
the “Karl Marx of fascism” (and also Benito Mussolini’s personal teacher),
there is no rational basis for economists to consider any of this extreme
wealth-inequality to be sub-“optimal.”

No wonder aristocrats favor such a
‘free market’ (and such an economic theory).

But it won’t do Ukrainians any good,
and it’s slaughtering the people in Donbass. However, any of that richest 0.7%
who care enough, one way or the other, about what’s happening there, are
promoting the nazis, who are doing those aristocrats’ dirty-work, regardless of
whether nazi bigots are aware of the fact, or even care whom they’re actually
serving, or why. Any of those nazis who are in the bottom 68.7% of the world’s
wealth-pyramid — the people who collectively own just 3% of the world’s private
wealth — are probably driven more by their hatred than by their greed, anyway.
They’re like sleepwalkers, or robots. Push their psychological buttons, and
they’re on, “for the cause.” True-believers, in some Big Lie or other. And, so,
they ‘volunteer’ their services far cheaper than do people who actually care.
(Most of their payment comes to them in the form of the personal pride they
get, for their race and nation. It doesn’t come out of any aristocrat’s hide.)
In that sense, they value themselves appropriately: dirt-cheap. (Of course,
they don’t understand this.) They’re a bargain for their unrecognized masters,
who push true-believers’ buttons by hiring propagandists such as Ross Kemp.

But, as for the residents in Donbass: these people are total victims in all of this.

—————

Investigative historian Eric Zuesse is
the author, most recently, of  They’re
Not Even Close: The Democratic vs. Republican Economic Records, 1910-2010
, 
and of  CHRIST’S
VENTRILOQUISTS: The Event that Created Christianity
.

Subscribe to our newsletter
Sign up here to get the latest news, updates and special offers delivered directly to your inbox.

Get real time updates directly on you device, subscribe now.

Comments