By Russkiy Malchik
Translated from Russian by J.Hawk
Information is still scarce. We have seen the main
principles which were clear. But it’s obvious that they spent 16 hours
discussing not the basic principles but the details. It is the details that are
the core of the peace plan.
Unfortunately neither Poroshenko nor other leaders signed
the joint declaration, and the “Collection of Measures” were signed only by the
members of the contact group, namely LPR/DPR, Kuchma in Kiev’s name, OSCE, and
Zurabov. That list likewise contains 13 points with fairly general
formulations, which will require further clarification. But there are also
specifics that have been published and by which we can assess how the
negotiations went and what kind of compromise was reached.
The first has to do with the withdrawal of heavy weapons
under OSCE control. The conditions are rather odd: it specifies a distance of 50km
(for cannon) or 140km (for rocket artillery), from the actual line of the front
as of midnight, February 15, and for the militia from the September 19 line
[the line of demarcation from Minsk-1].
This means that both sides should leave their positions,
creating a huge belt (100-300km) without weapons, de facto up to the borders of
the Donetsk and Lugansk regions. Which leads to the following question: who
will control it? This is the key question. So far there are no clear answers.
But considering that the issue of peacekeepers was frequently brought up, this
is who they have in mind. It is not for nothing that the Donbass
representatives said that they will accept only Russian and Belarusian
peacekeepers. Kiev, on the other hand, does not want peacekeepers, but if it
does agree it will want NATO troops. So there is a big question mark here.
The second interesting provision is this. In the paragraph
11 which concerns Ukraine’s constitutional reform, which is to be implemented by
the end of 2015, there is a provision which includes the main provisions of the
law on the “Special Status of Lugansk and Donetsk Region”, which read as
–Immunity from punishment, prosecution, or discrimination
for individuals which participated in the events that took place in various
parts of the Donetsk and Lugansk regions (this amounts to legalizing all
–The right to language self-determination.
–The participation of local self-government in the nominating
process for the office of prosecutor general and the courts in the regions (LPR
and DPR de-facto control over the legal and law enforcement systems).
–The central government shall enter into agreements with the
local self-government concerning economic, social, and cultural development of
the regions (Kiev will enter into agreements with Donetsk and Lugansk
concerning all crucial aspects of the joint economy).
–The government supports the socio-economic development of
the separate regions (Kiev will partially finance the reconstruction of Lugansk
and Donetsk, and guarantees the fulfillment of social obligations).
–The central government shall facilitate cross-border
cooperation between the several districts of the Donetsk and Lugansk regions
with regions of the Russian Federation (Kiev will not oppose the cooperation
between Lugansk, Donetsk, and Russia).
–The establishment of people’s militia in accordance with
local government decisions in order to maintain public order in the several
regions (the militia becomes a law enforcement organization, all power
institutions remain under the control of the current leadership).
–The authority of the local authorities and officials from
special elections that were designated by the Verkhovna Rada in accordance with
this law, cannot be invalidated before their terms run out (this guarantees the
rights of the current DPR and LPR government until they are re-elected as part
of the process of forming local self-government through new elections).
As a result, Donbass receives widespread autonomy within
the framework of nominally unitary Ukraine. This is the compromise which
satisfied Putin after the 16-hour Minsk marathon. Moreover, France and Germany
guarantee the re-establishment of the Donbass banking system, and will reach an
agreement with Russia concerning the rules concerning the free trade zone
between EU, Russia, and Ukraine, while taking into consideration the special
status of Donbass.
The third detail pertains to border control. Here the
language is extremely clear. The border between Ukraine and Russia will be
re-established only after Ukraine carries out constitutional reforms, which
implies autonomy (self-government, people’s militia, cross-border cooperation
with Russia). In other words, once Kiev gives Donbass control over its own
territory, then the border shall be re-established…but will remain under
To sum up this quick analysis based on still-incomplete
information one can say the following: in purely diplomatic sense, Russia
scored a success, forcing Kiev and the West to accept a painful and temporary,
but real compromise. It is based on freezing the military conflict and the
autonomy of the Donbass while nominally preserving Ukraine’s borders. In
practice we are talking about reformatting Ukraine from a unitary into a
federal state, regardless of Poroshenko’s denials. If the Galicia banderites
realize this, they’ll start screaming about “Poroshenko’s treason.”
Of course, the implementation of the agreement is another
question. The fact that neither Poroshenko nor European leaders signed it does
not make it easier. On the other hand, Hollande’s and Merkel’s wishes are more
than real, so it will fall to them to compel Kiev to implement the “Collection
of Measures.” The only other option is a complete defeat for Ukrainian forces. To
which Putin merrily alluded when he mentioned Debaltsevo—either you come out
with your hands up, or you’ll continue to get killed.
The Minsk peace plan from February 12 does not solve the
problem (and it could not solve it), but creates the possibility to delay the
war until the end of 2015. With one condition: that Kiev and Washington accept
the federalization of Ukraine. If not, the war will come to Kiev.
The biggest factor here is whether the
Ukrainian military is up to the task of continuing the fighting. If it is, if
Poroshenko believes its forces have been sufficiently restored, the fighting
will resume. However, the Ukrainian military took a heavy beating in the last
months’ fighting and it will find it difficult to replace the lost equipment.
Mobilization is unpopular, and there is little chance that NATO will rearm
Ukraine. Last but not least, there is also the IMF and its stringent conditions
on government spending that come as part of its bailout packages. Yaresko had
already announced that Ukraine’s budget will have to undergo significant
changes in order to accommodate the IMF. It’s difficult to see what else in
that budget could be cut aside from the defense spending. Hollande and Merkel
are not stupid, they’ve seen enough of Poroshenko to know what he is capable
of, so therefore they will most likely act through the IMF to reduce Ukraine’s
ability to wage war.
So overall this is a better agreement than Minsk-1, though not as good one as might have been reached should the Ukrainian military first suffered a catastrophic defeat. The fact that Novorossia will continue to enjoy unimpeded contact with the Russian Federation is also a major plus–Minsk-1 agreement called for the border control to be returned to Ukraine.
But in the meantime Novorossia continues to exist and to enjoy a high degree of autonomy, though it is not likely that its authority will spread all the way to the borders of the Lugansk and Donetsk regions, even though Minsk-2 does not appear to contain any language concerning demarcation lines.
The above, of course, assumes that there will be a ceasefire at midnight of February 15, and there might not be one. Minsk-2 says nothing about Debaltsevo, which means the Ukrainian side will continue its attempts to break into or out of the encirclement. If the ceasefire goes into effect as of the 15th with the Ukrainian forces still trapped in Debaltsevo, they will have no choice but to surrender their weapons and depart. Poroshenko cannot allow that to happen, so the fighting could well continue. One can always perpetrate a “false flag” attack or two as an excuse for breaking the ceasefire…