Poroshenko asks for peacekeeping troops. Prelude to the partition of Ukraine?

0 72

2/18/2015

Poroshenko requests Western peacekeepers! Is it the beginning of the partition of Ukraine?  

By Russkiy Malchik

Translated from Russian by J.Hawk

The situation is developing rapidly, as Poroshenko
immediately after his “victory” at Debaltsevo came out with the following
initiative: to invite an EU police mission to Ukraine with a UN peacekeeping
mandate, and to conduct multinational military exercises. He immediately warned
that he discussed these decisions in Minsk with Russia, France, and Germany. It’s
understandable why—you need the consent of all UNSC permanent members to pull
it off.

- Advertisement -

This is unquestionably a big deal, because it can mean only
one thing: Russia together with Europe and Poroshenko agreed to a de-facto
partitioning of Ukraine into spheres of influence which will be controlled by
military personnel with peacekeeping functions. It’s self-evident that the
Donbass will accept only Russians, Belarusians, and forces from countries
covered by the Treaty on Collective Security. At the same time Kiev will only
accept EU troops. Here one has to be certain we are talking about EU troops
(EUROFOR, which has acted as an independent force in several conflicts), and
not about NATO troops or, especially, US troops. This is an important
consideration, because Poroshenko and Washington may try to pull a fast one, so
one needs to be careful.

When it comes down to it, Poroshenko and the West are
proposing to partition Ukraine along the current border with LPR and DPR, so as
to avoid losing even more territory in the event of a war. I don’t know whether
this is an appropriate choice at the moment, since the size of Novorossia is
far from optimal. But everything depends on the chosen strategy: either
continue to strangle the junta, using the ceasefire to strengthen own forces
and to create new cauldrons (in that case one cannot agree to peacekeepers), or
to pick the option of peaceful economic strangulation of the Kiev regime, which
can’t be too far off (and then introduce peacekeepers to freeze the situation
before a direct conflict with the West). Here there are many things to talk
about. But perhaps this is what they spent 16 hours discussing in Minsk?

J.Hawk’s Comment: Considering how sparse the ceasefire
provisions were, it’s highly likely that there was a sphere of influence
discussion held in Minsk. No way it took 16 hours to hammer out the “packet of measures” that everyone promptly ignored! However,  all three world leaders present there are interested
in defusing the situation. What Poroshenko thinks is immaterial—Russia,
Germany, and France collectively hold Ukraine’s future in their hands, whereas
Washington does not. Moreover, Putin did mention peacekeepers as being desirable in this situation, but he also
mentioned the administrative borders of Donetsk and Lugansk regions, while the
Minsk-2 agreement did not specify any boundaries of Novorossia. So there are many details still to be hammered out.

It was reported elsewhere that the call for peacekeepers was
also issued by the Council of National Defense and Security, which is headed by
Aleksandr Turchinov. Martial law does not seem to be in the cards, and Ukraine
finally appears to be heading toward de-escalation of the conflict. We’ll see
if the trend holds. One thing seems relatively certain: neither Merkel nor Hollande would want to see a provocative NATO force in Ukraine, which means the more benign EUROFOR does appear to be the more likely candidate for the mission. Should they be deployed, one wonders what their experience with the Right Sector and the “volunteer battalions” is going to be, seeing that the West had “betrayed” Ukraine in its “civilizational struggle” against Russia…

Subscribe to our newsletter
Sign up here to get the latest news, updates and special offers delivered directly to your inbox.

Get real time updates directly on you device, subscribe now.

Comments